Mid-Year IEP Goal Bank for SLPs
A Mid-Year Checkpoint That Actually Moves Progress Forward
Many SLPs reach January and realize how much can shift once the school year settles. Students show new strengths. Some needs become clearer. Others plateau in ways you could not see in September. This is why mid-year SLP IEP goals matter for SLPs. A thoughtful review helps you align instruction with who your students are now, not who they were at the start of the year. It is also the moment when speech therapy goals can be strengthened with clearer targets and more responsive support.
What Mid-Year IEP Goals Reveal for SLPs
January has a way of helping you see your learners with fresh eyes. By this point in the year, routines feel solid and the work gets a little more complex, so students often reveal needs and strengths that were easy to miss in September. That is why mid-year IEP goals can be so helpful for SLPs. A quick review gives you a clearer sense of what is clicking, where a student needs more support, and whether your current speech therapy goals match the realities of their school day. It is a natural pause point to recalibrate and make sure your plans reflect who your students are right now.
How Mid-Year Data Shapes Goal Revision
As winter benchmarks, probes, and session notes accumulate, you gain enough data to evaluate whether goals are appropriately rigorous. Mid-year data helps you see growth trends and identify where a student may have reached mastery sooner than expected. It also reveals areas that need more explicit instruction or a different scaffolding approach. This data-driven lens allows you to revise speech therapy goals with more precision, update criteria, or shift your focus to skills that have become more urgent for classroom success.
Patterns SLPs Commonly See in January
SLPs often notice several recurring trends at the halfway point. Some students make rapid gains once routines are established, while others show steady progress but need clearer steps to reach mastery. You may also see plateaus in generalization, particularly with articulation carryover, narrative skills, or pragmatic language. January is a common time to uncover gaps that were less visible early in the year, especially for students who struggle with language comprehension in more complex academic units. Understanding these patterns helps you plan mid-year IEP goals that respond to emerging needs rather than simply repeating fall priorities.
When to Adjust, Rewrite, or Continue Goals
Mid-year reflection gives you space to look at each learner and decide what truly needs to shift and what is still serving them well. Sometimes a student is on the right track and you only need to adjust a goal by changing the criteria, supports, or setting. Other times the goal itself no longer fits, and a rewrite makes more sense because the priority skill has changed or the data shows the current target is not moving the needle. And there are moments when continuing a goal is the best call because the student is making progress, just not at mastery yet. These small but thoughtful decisions help keep your SLP IEP goals responsive and aligned with the communication skills your students are building right now.
How to Use This Mid-Year IEP Goal Bank
An IEP goal bank for SLPs is most helpful when you treat it as a starting point rather than a script. These examples can spark ideas, clarify the language you want to use, or help you shape SMART goals that feel more measurable and meaningful. Every student brings a unique communication profile, so you will always want to tweak, reshape, or rebuild any sample goal to match what your data shows and what the student needs in real time. Think of this bank as inspiration as you take your mid-year insights and turn them into clear next steps.
Understanding Present Levels and New Data
Before choosing or amending any goal, take a fresh look at your present levels. Mid-year data often reveals things that were not obvious in the fall. The information you gather across daily interactions and classroom moments helps you see which skills are strengthening and which ones still need focused support. This context makes it much easier to select goals that fit. It also helps you avoid accidentally keeping a goal that no longer reflects the student’s most important skill. Using updated present levels as your anchor ensures that any measurable IEP goals you write are grounded in the learner you see today.
Writing Goals That Reflect Mid-Year Progress
As you review your data, notice what has changed since September. Some students make big leaps once routines settle, while others need more time or a clearer path. Mid-year progress is a valuable guide when shaping new SMART goals. You might tighten criteria, increase complexity, or shift the focus to a skill that is emerging and ready for more targeted practice. If you pull a goal from the bank, personalize it by adjusting the accuracy level, level of support, or context so it matches the student’s actual growth. These small adjustments help you create goals that feel both ambitious and doable.
Aligning Goals With Services, Minutes, and Scheduling Needs
A good goal only works when it fits inside the service model you can realistically provide. Mid-year is a great time to check whether your goals align with the minutes, group sizes, and scheduling structures in place. If a student now requires more direct practice or needs opportunities embedded in the classroom, adjust the goal so it pairs well with the level of service they receive. This is also where small tweaks matter. A goal that looks solid on paper may need a different context or support level to match your schedule and the student’s daily routines. By aligning your goals with the services you deliver, you set students up for genuine progress rather than frustration.
Articulation IEP Goal Bank
These articulation IEP goals are starting points you can personalize. Each goal can be adjusted for specific sounds, levels of support, accuracy expectations, or contexts based on your mid-year data and each learner’s unique communication profile.
Sound Production Goals (Initial, Medial, Final)
These speech sound goals target accurate production at the syllable, word, and sentence level and can be modified for any phoneme.
- Within three months, the student will correctly produce the /s/ sound in the initial position at the word level with 85 percent accuracy during structured articulation tasks.
- By the end of the quarter, the student will produce the /r/ sound in the final position at the word level with 80 percent accuracy as measured during therapy sessions.
- Over the next six weeks, the student will accurately produce medial /l/ in simple phrases (e.g., “yellow ball,†“silly dogâ€) with 75 percent accuracy in structured activities.
- Within two months, the student will produce consonant clusters (e.g., “st,†“pl,†“brâ€) in the initial position at the phrase level with 80 percent accuracy during speech tasks.
- By the end of the semester, the student will correctly produce multisyllabic words containing the target sound (e.g., “refrigerator,†“helicopterâ€) with 85 percent accuracy in oral reading tasks.
- Over the next quarter, the student will imitate the target sound in isolation and syllables (e.g., “ra,†“ree,†“roâ€) with 90 percent accuracy during structured practice.
- Within three months, the student will accurately produce final consonants (e.g., /t/, /k/, /p/) in CVC words with 80 percent accuracy in structured therapy activities.
Carryover and Generalization Goals
These goals support transferring accurate sound production into more natural and spontaneous communication.
- By the end of the semester, the student will correctly produce the target sound at the sentence level with 85 percent accuracy during structured conversation.
- Within three months, the student will self-monitor articulation of the target sound and correct errors independently in 4 out of 5 opportunities during therapy sessions.
- Over the next quarter, the student will use the target sound accurately in unstructured peer conversations with 75 percent accuracy as observed during social interactions.
- Within six months, the student will generalize accurate production of the target sound into classroom discussions with 80 percent accuracy as measured by teacher observation.
- By the end of the school year, the student will apply articulation strategies (e.g., slow rate, clear placement cues) during academic tasks with 85 percent accuracy in observed opportunities.
- Within two months, the student will produce the target sound in spontaneous speech during short storytelling activities with 75 percent accuracy, as documented in therapy notes.
Connected Speech and Intelligibility Goals
These articulation IEP goals support clarity, rate, and intelligibility across broader communication contexts.
- By the end of the semester, the student will produce clear, intelligible speech during a two to three minute structured conversation with 80 percent overall accuracy as measured by clinician observation.
- Within three months, the student will reduce omission and substitution errors in connected speech, improving overall intelligibility by 20 percent as measured through informal speech samples.
- Over the next quarter, the student will accurately produce multisyllabic words in connected sentences with 85 percent accuracy during structured language tasks.
- Within six weeks, the student will use appropriate articulatory placement in connected speech during reading passages with 80 percent accuracy as documented in session data.
- By the end of the school year, the student will maintain intelligible speech during classroom participation, achieving 85 percent clarity across three consecutive observations.
- Within two months, the student will slow their speech rate when cued, improving intelligibility to 80 percent during structured conversations.
- Over the next semester, the student will blend sounds smoothly in connected speech, reducing distortions and increasing intelligibility to 75 percent during informal interactions.
Expressive Language IEP Goal Bank
These expressive language IEP goals are starting points you can adjust based on mid-year data, service level, and each student’s communication profile. Personalize accuracy levels, contexts, vocabulary lists, or scaffolds as needed.
Vocabulary and Word Retrieval Goals
- Within three months, the student will label grade-level vocabulary words during structured tasks with 80 percent accuracy as measured in therapy sessions.
- By the end of the quarter, the student will use new vocabulary words in oral sentences with 75 percent accuracy during classroom or therapy activities.
- Over the next six weeks, the student will describe common objects using at least two attributes (e.g., size, color, category) in 4 out of 5 opportunities during language tasks.
- Within two months, the student will independently retrieve target words when given semantic or phonemic cues with 80 percent accuracy in structured activities.
- By the end of the semester, the student will generate synonyms or antonyms for familiar vocabulary words with 85 percent accuracy during group lessons.
- Over the next quarter, the student will sort vocabulary words into categories and explain their reasoning in 4 out of 5 opportunities during therapy.
- Within three months, the student will use descriptive vocabulary in short oral explanations with 75 percent accuracy as measured by clinician observation.
Grammar and Sentence Structure Goals
- By the end of the semester, the student will produce grammatically correct sentences using appropriate verb tense (e.g., past, present, future) with 80 percent accuracy during structured language tasks.
- Within three months, the student will use appropriate subject verb agreement in oral sentences with 85 percent accuracy during small-group activities.
- Over the next quarter, the student will formulate compound sentences using conjunctions (e.g., “and,†“but,†“becauseâ€) in 4 out of 5 structured tasks as measured in therapy notes.
- Within two months, the student will expand simple sentences by adding at least one detail (e.g., where, when, how) in 80 percent of opportunities during language activities.
- By the end of the school year, the student will use correct pronouns (e.g., he, she, they) in spontaneous conversation with 75 percent accuracy as observed during sessions.
- Over the next six weeks, the student will produce complete sentences when given a picture prompt in 4 out of 5 opportunities during structured tasks.
- Within three months, the student will use appropriate morphological endings (e.g., plural s, past tense ed) in oral language with 80 percent accuracy during therapy sessions.
Narrative and Story Retell Goals
- By the end of the quarter, the student will retell a familiar story using key events in correct sequence with 75 percent accuracy during structured retell tasks.
- Within two months, the student will include character, setting, and problem details when retelling a short narrative in 4 out of 5 opportunities as measured in therapy notes.
- Over the next semester, the student will tell a short personal narrative with a clear beginning, middle, and end with 80 percent accuracy during structured storytelling activities.
- By the end of the semester, the student will answer open ended questions about a story (e.g., who, what, where, why) with 85 percent accuracy during reading comprehension tasks.
- Within three months, the student will use transition words (e.g., first, next, then, finally) in oral story retells in 4 out of 5 opportunities during language activities.
- Over the next six weeks, the student will generate a simple story from a picture sequence including at least three events with 75 percent accuracy as measured in session data.
Receptive Language IEP Goal Bank
These receptive language IEP goals are meant to be starting points you can adjust for each student’s needs, accuracy expectations, service levels, and classroom demands. Personalize vocabulary, contexts, cueing, and complexity as needed.
Following Directions Goals
- Within two months, the student will follow one step directions containing basic concepts (e.g., under, next to, behind) in 4 out of 5 opportunities during structured activities.
- By the end of the quarter, the student will follow two step related directions (e.g., “Open your book and find page tenâ€) with 80 percent accuracy during teacher led tasks.
- Over the next six weeks, the student will follow two step unrelated directions (e.g., “Touch the circle and then stand upâ€) in 4 out of 5 opportunities as measured in therapy sessions.
- Within three months, the student will follow directions with embedded modifiers (e.g., “Find the small red blockâ€) with 75 percent accuracy during structured tasks.
- By the end of the semester, the student will follow multi step classroom directions (e.g., “Get your notebook, write your name at the top, and turn to page twoâ€) with 70 percent accuracy as observed during academic routines.
- Over the next quarter, the student will follow directions that require spatial understanding (e.g., in front of, between, beside) with 80 percent accuracy in structured activities.
- Within two months, the student will follow directions presented at a natural classroom pace with reduced repetition in 4 out of 5 opportunities as documented in therapy notes.
WH-Question Understanding Goals
- By the end of the quarter, the student will answer “who†and “what†questions about short passages read aloud with 80 percent accuracy during structured comprehension tasks.
- Within three months, the student will answer “where†questions using picture scenes or stories with 85 percent accuracy as measured in therapy sessions.
- Over the next semester, the student will answer “when†questions requiring understanding of time concepts (e.g., morning, afternoon, yesterday) in 4 out of 5 opportunities.
- By the end of the semester, the student will answer “why†questions that require simple reasoning with 75 percent accuracy during structured discussions.
- Within two months, the student will respond accurately to mixed WH questions presented in random order with 80 percent accuracy during listening comprehension tasks.
- Over the next six weeks, the student will identify the correct answer to WH questions given three visual choices with 85 percent accuracy in structured activities.
- Within three months, the student will answer “how†questions that require describing a simple process (e.g., “How do you make a sandwich?â€) with 70 percent accuracy as documented in therapy notes.
Classroom Language Processing Goals
- By the end of the quarter, the student will identify the main idea of a short teacher read passage with 75 percent accuracy during structured listening tasks.
- Within three months, the student will follow along with short classroom explanations and respond to a comprehension question with 80 percent accuracy in 4 out of 5 opportunities.
- Over the next semester, the student will recall three key details from a short story or informational text read aloud with 85 percent accuracy during language activities.
- By the end of the semester, the student will interpret basic figurative language (e.g., “It is raining cats and dogsâ€) with 70 percent accuracy during structured tasks.
- Within six weeks, the student will identify familiar vocabulary from grade level classroom lessons with 80 percent accuracy during listening activities.
- Over the next quarter, the student will process multi sentence spoken directions and respond correctly in 4 out of 5 opportunities during academic routines.
Pragmatic Communication IEP Goal Bank
These pragmatic language goals are starting points you can personalize based on each learner’s strengths, social communication profile, and mid-year data. Modify cueing, contexts, accuracy levels, and interaction types to match real needs.
Conversation Skills Goals
- Within three months, the student will initiate a conversation with a peer using an appropriate opener (e.g., “Hi, can I join you?â€) in 4 out of 5 opportunities during structured social activities.
- By the end of the quarter, the student will maintain a conversation for at least three conversational turns with 75 percent accuracy as measured in therapy sessions.
- Over the next six weeks, the student will ask relevant follow up questions during a peer conversation with 80 percent accuracy during small group activities.
- Within two months, the student will make on topic comments in a conversation in 4 out of 5 opportunities during structured practice.
- By the end of the semester, the student will use appropriate conversational transitions (e.g., “That reminds me of…â€) with 75 percent accuracy during structured discussions.
- Over the next quarter, the student will demonstrate active listening behaviors (e.g., nodding, orienting body, responding appropriately) in 80 percent of observed interactions.
- Within three months, the student will signal misunderstanding or confusion (e.g., “Can you say that again?â€) in 4 out of 5 opportunities during role play activities.
Perspective Taking and Problem-Solving Goals
- By the end of the quarter, the student will identify how a peer might feel in a given scenario with 80 percent accuracy during structured tasks.
- Within three months, the student will generate at least two possible solutions to a simple social problem (e.g., sharing materials, turn taking) in 4 out of 5 opportunities.
- Over the next semester, the student will describe the perspective of a story character with 75 percent accuracy during structured comprehension activities.
- By the end of the semester, the student will identify the cause of a social conflict and propose an appropriate solution with 70 percent accuracy during role play scenarios.
- Within two months, the student will explain how their actions might affect others in 4 out of 5 opportunities during supported discussions.
- Over the next six weeks, the student will recognize nonverbal cues (e.g., facial expressions, body posture, tone of voice) and label the associated emotion with 85 percent accuracy in structured activities.
- Within three months, the student will choose an appropriate strategy for resolving a peer disagreement (e.g., taking turns, asking for help) in 4 out of 5 structured trials.
Classroom and Peer Interaction Goals
- By the end of the semester, the student will participate in a small group activity by taking turns and sharing materials appropriately in 80 percent of observed opportunities.
- Within three months, the student will follow classroom routines during transitions with minimal prompts in 4 out of 5 opportunities as measured in teacher observations.
- Over the next quarter, the student will respond appropriately when greeted by a peer or adult with 85 percent accuracy during naturalistic interactions.
- Within two months, the student will join a peer activity appropriately (e.g., waiting, asking, commenting) in 4 out of 5 opportunities during structured play or group tasks.
- By the end of the school year, the student will contribute a relevant idea or comment during group discussions with 75 percent accuracy as documented in class activities.
- Over the next six weeks, the student will stay on topic during a short peer interaction for at least three conversational turns in 4 out of 5 opportunities during therapy sessions.
Fluency IEP Goal Bank
These fluency IEP goals are meant to be starting points that you can personalize based on the student’s fluency profile, the strategies you’re teaching, and the level of support needed. Feel free to adjust the accuracy, context, or strategy type as you see fit.
Strategy Identification and Use
- Within two months, the student will identify moments of disfluency in their own speech in 4 out of 5 opportunities during structured therapy tasks.
- By the end of the quarter, the student will name at least two fluency strategies (e.g., easy onset, pausing) and describe when to use them with 80 percent accuracy as measured in therapy notes.
- Over the next six weeks, the student will use a slow rate strategy during short reading tasks with 75 percent accuracy during structured sessions.
- Within three months, the student will use easy onset to begin vowel initial words in 4 out of 5 opportunities during guided practice.
- By the end of the semester, the student will identify which fluency strategy helps them most and explain why with 80 percent accuracy during structured reflection tasks.
- Over the next quarter, the student will apply light articulatory contacts in structured word level tasks with 85 percent accuracy as documented in clinician observation.
- Within two months, the student will demonstrate pausing and phrasing in short sentence level tasks with 80 percent accuracy during therapy.
Disfluency Reduction in Structured Tasks
- By the end of the quarter, the student will reduce disfluencies by 40 percent during structured reading tasks as measured through clinician data.
- Within three months, the student will maintain fluent speech during short picture description tasks in 4 out of 5 opportunities as observed in therapy sessions.
- Over the next semester, the student will use a chosen fluency strategy to produce fluent phrases in 80 percent of opportunities during structured activities.
- By the end of the semester, the student will demonstrate a slow and controlled speech rate during structured conversations, reducing disfluencies by 50 percent as measured in session notes.
- Within six weeks, the student will use voluntary stuttering during structured practice to increase comfort with stuttering moments in 4 out of 5 opportunities.
- Over the next quarter, the student will complete short oral presentations in therapy with no more than two disfluencies per minute as documented in clinician data.
- Within two months, the student will demonstrate improved breath support by initiating sentences with a relaxed onset in 80 percent of opportunities during structured tasks.
Carryover to Natural Settings
- By the end of the school year, the student will use fluency strategies during peer conversations with 75 percent accuracy as measured through small group interactions.
- Within three months, the student will apply a fluency strategy independently during classroom discussions in 4 out of 5 observed opportunities.
- Over the next quarter, the student will participate in informal conversations with peers while maintaining fluent speech in 70 percent of responses as documented in teacher notes.
- Within two months, the student will use pausing and phrasing to support fluency during reading aloud tasks in the classroom with 80 percent accuracy.
- By the end of the semester, the student will use a self monitoring checklist to track fluency during real life speaking tasks with 75 percent consistency.
- Over the next six weeks, the student will demonstrate reduced physical tension during spontaneous speech by using relaxation and breath strategies in 4 out of 5 observed opportunities.
AAC and Functional Communication IEP Goal Bank
These AAC IEP goals are meant to serve as flexible starting points. Each learner uses their device differently, so you can adjust vocabulary sets, access methods, prompts, accuracy expectations, and communication partners based on mid-year data and day to day needs. These functional communication goals support meaningful, authentic communication across school settings.
Device Navigation Goals
- Within six weeks, the student will independently locate at least five core vocabulary words on their AAC device in 4 out of 5 opportunities during structured activities.
- By the end of the quarter, the student will navigate between two pages or folders on their device to find a target word with 80 percent accuracy as measured during therapy sessions.
- Within three months, the student will select the correct symbol from a field of at least six options with 85 percent accuracy during structured communication tasks.
- Over the next semester, the student will use their AAC device to construct a simple two word message (e.g., “want toyâ€) in 4 out of 5 opportunities during familiar routines.
- Within two months, the student will use the search function or category navigation feature on their device to find a target word with 75 percent accuracy as observed during therapy.
- By the end of the school year, the student will independently navigate between home, core, and activity pages on their device during classroom tasks with 80 percent accuracy.
- Within three months, the student will combine symbols across two different pages to create a short phrase in 4 out of 5 opportunities during structured activities.
Core Vocabulary Goals
- By the end of the quarter, the student will use at least five core words (e.g., go, stop, more, help, want) during structured communication tasks in 4 out of 5 opportunities.
- Within two months, the student will use a core verb (e.g., want, need, like) to express a clear intent with 80 percent accuracy during therapy sessions.
- Over the next six weeks, the student will use core words to comment (e.g., “look,†“big,†“funâ€) in 4 out of 5 opportunities during structured play.
- Within three months, the student will combine a core verb and noun (e.g., “want ballâ€) to form a functional two word message with 75 percent accuracy during familiar routines.
- By the end of the semester, the student will use core vocabulary to answer simple questions (e.g., “What do you want?†“Where go?â€) with 80 percent accuracy during structured activities.
- Over the next quarter, the student will use core vocabulary to protest or refuse (e.g., “no,†“stop,†“don’t wantâ€) in 4 out of 5 opportunities during daily routines.
- Within two months, the student will use core words to describe basic attributes (e.g., “big,†“hot,†“fastâ€) with 75 percent accuracy during AAC supported tasks.
Requesting, Commenting, and Repairing Communication Breakdowns
- By the end of the quarter, the student will use their AAC device to make requests for preferred items or activities in 4 out of 5 observed opportunities during familiar routines.
- Within three months, the student will initiate a comment (e.g., “fun,†“I see,†“that bigâ€) with 75 percent accuracy during structured play or shared reading.
- Over the next semester, the student will respond to a partner’s question or comment using their AAC system in 4 out of 5 opportunities during therapy sessions.
- Within two months, the student will repair communication breakdowns by selecting an alternative symbol, repeating a message, or adding information with 70 percent accuracy during structured practice.
- By the end of the school year, the student will use their device to request help (e.g., “help,†“help me,†“need helpâ€) in 4 out of 5 naturally occurring opportunities as observed across settings.
- Over the next six weeks, the student will use their AAC device to clarify meaning when a listener expresses confusion (e.g., “not that,†“I mean…â€) with 75 percent accuracy during role play and therapy activities.
Final Thoughts and Resources for SLPs
As you move through the second half of the school year, it is our hope that this IEP goal bank for SLPs can give you practical starting points that you can adjust to each student’s needs. Use these examples to guide revisions, spark new ideas, and keep your goals measurable and meaningful as your learners grow. If you need additional speech therapy support or want tools that make planning and documentation easier, Lighthouse Therapy offers resources built specifically for SLPs. We are here to help you carry strong, thoughtful communication work through the rest of the year.

