Navigating the Future of Speech Therapy: Virtual vs. In-Person SLP Care

The field of speech-language pathology (SLP) is evolving, with teletherapy playing an increasingly prominent role in how services are delivered. While in-person therapy has long been the traditional approach, virtual speech therapy has gained significant traction, especially in the past decade.Advances in technology, evolving educational models, and the growing shortage of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in schools have all contributed to the rise of telepractice as a critical solution for providing speech therapy services. With many school districts struggling to fill SLP positions, virtual therapy has become an essential tool for ensuring that students receive the intervention they need, regardless of geographic barriers.

For SLPs, especially those who are newly entering the field, deciding between virtual and in-person therapy can be a critical career choice. Each setting comes with its own set of advantages and challenges, influencing not only therapy effectiveness but also long-term career satisfaction. Understanding these differences is essential for professionals looking to build a sustainable and rewarding practice.

Several key factors should be taken into account when weighing these options. Effectiveness is a primary concern, as certain clients and disorders may respond better to one modality over the other. Career opportunities also vary depending on whether an SLP chooses telepractice or a traditional in-person role, with differences in job availability, work settings, and required licensure. Salary can differ based on employment structure, geographic location, and whether an SLP is working for a private practice, school district, or telehealth provider. Work-life balance is another major consideration, as teletherapy offers increased flexibility but may also present challenges related to screen fatigue and engagement. Finally, client outcomes are a central factor, as the ability to connect with and effectively treat clients can depend on whether therapy is conducted virtually or in person.

As the demand for speech therapy continues to grow, SLPs must navigate these choices with a clear understanding of what each option entails. Whether seeking stability and hands-on interaction in a clinical or school setting or embracing the flexibility and innovation of teletherapy, SLPs must consider their personal preferences, professional goals, and the needs of their clients. This article explores the pros and cons of both virtual and in-person speech therapy to help SLPs make an informed decision about their career path.

Understanding Virtual vs. In-Person Speech Therapy

Virtual Speech Therapy (Telepractice)

Virtual speech therapy, commonly referred to as telepractice, involves delivering speech-language pathology services through telecommunication technologies. This approach enables clinicians to provide assessment, intervention, consultation, and education remotely, connecting with clients via real-time audio and video platforms. Telepractice has become an integral model of service delivery, offering flexibility and expanded reach to diverse populations.

In-Person Speech Therapy

In-person speech therapy entails face-to-face interactions between the speech-language pathologist (SLP) and the client within a shared physical space. This traditional method allows for direct observation, hands-on techniques, and immediate environmental feedback, fostering a dynamic therapeutic environment. In-person sessions are particularly beneficial for clients requiring tactile cues or those with complex needs that benefit from physical presence.

Emerging Trends in Telepractice

The adoption of telepractice has accelerated, driven by technological advancements and the need for accessible healthcare solutions. Emerging trends include the integration of remote patient monitoring, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence to enhance therapeutic outcomes. These innovations aim to address challenges such as clinician shortages and to provide personalized, real-world therapy experiences.

However, it’s essential to recognize that telepractice may not be suitable for all clients or clinical scenarios. Factors such as the client’s technological access, specific disorder characteristics, and personal preferences play a crucial role in determining the appropriateness of virtual therapy. SLPs must assess each case individually to ensure that the chosen mode of service delivery aligns with the client’s needs and promotes optimal outcomes.

In summary, both virtual and in-person speech therapy offer valuable avenues for service delivery. Understanding the nuances, benefits, and limitations of each approach empowers SLPs to make informed decisions tailored to their clients’ unique circumstances.

Pros and Cons of In-Person Speech Therapy for SLPs

Pros of In-Person Speech Therapy

1. Stronger Client Engagement & Interaction
   In-person speech therapy sessions offer a unique advantage in terms of client engagement and interaction. Being physically present allows SLPs to observe body language, facial expressions, and subtle communication behaviors that might be less noticeable during virtual sessions. This enables therapists to provide immediate feedback and adjust their approach based on real-time observations. Additionally, tactile tools, physical prompts, and hands-on techniques can be incorporated into therapy sessions to enhance learning and skill acquisition. These elements are especially valuable for clients who benefit from sensory-based approaches or kinesthetic learning.
2. More Effective for Certain Populations
   In-person therapy tends to be more effective for certain populations, particularly young children, individuals with severe speech and language disorders, or those requiring physical prompting and direct feedback. For example, toddlers often respond better to face-to-face interactions that incorporate play-based activities, which are easier to facilitate in an in-person setting. Likewise, individuals who require techniques such as PROMPT therapy (Prompts for Restructuring Oral Muscular Phonetic Targets) benefit from the physical cues and tactile feedback that can only be provided during in-person sessions.
3. Better Collaboration with Teams
   In clinical, school, or healthcare settings, in-person speech therapy allows for seamless collaboration with other professionals, such as teachers, occupational therapists, physical therapists, and caregivers. Direct communication and observation of the client’s interactions with their support team can provide valuable insights into the client’s overall progress and needs. Additionally, the ability to participate in team meetings, observe classroom dynamics, and consult with other specialists on-site fosters a more holistic approach to intervention planning and implementation. This type of collaboration can be challenging to replicate in a virtual environment.

Cons of In-Person Speech Therapy

1. Less Flexibility
   One of the primary drawbacks of in-person speech therapy is the lack of flexibility in scheduling and work environment. SLPs working in traditional settings, such as schools, hospitals, or clinics, are often required to adhere to fixed work hours, limiting their ability to customize their schedule. Commuting to and from the workplace can add additional time constraints, making it harder for SLPs to balance work with personal responsibilities or pursue part-time or freelance opportunities. In contrast, teletherapy offers more control over work hours and location.
2. Higher Costs
   In-person speech therapy can involve higher costs for both SLPs and clients. For SLPs working in private practice, expenses related to office rental, equipment, utilities, and administrative support can be significant. Additionally, travel expenses and time spent commuting can add up over time, particularly for SLPs providing home-based services. For organizations, maintaining physical spaces for therapy and covering associated overhead costs can be a financial burden. These factors can make in-person therapy less cost-effective compared to telepractice.
3. Limited Geographic Reach
   In-person speech therapy is inherently limited to clients within a specific geographic area. This can pose challenges for SLPs looking to expand their client base or those living in regions with limited demand for speech-language services. It may also be difficult for clients in rural or underserved areas to access in-person services due to a lack of local providers. In contrast, telepractice allows SLPs to connect with clients across multiple locations (within licensure limits), expanding their reach and opening up more opportunities for professional growth and service delivery.

Overall, in-person speech therapy remains a vital and effective mode of service delivery for many clients, particularly those who require hands-on support, direct interaction, and collaborative team-based approaches. However, SLPs must consider factors such as cost, flexibility, and geographic reach when deciding whether in-person therapy aligns with their professional goals and the needs of their clients. Understanding both the advantages and challenges of this approach is crucial for making informed decisions about how to structure a sustainable and rewarding career in speech-language pathology.

Pros and Cons of Virtual Speech Therapy for SLPs

Pros of Virtual Speech Therapy

1. Flexibility & Work-Life Balance
   One of the most significant advantages of virtual speech therapy is the increased flexibility it provides for speech-language pathologists. Telepractice allows SLPs to work from home, eliminating long commutes and giving them greater control over their schedules. This flexibility can be especially beneficial for those balancing professional responsibilities with personal obligations, such as childcare, continuing education, or other career pursuits. Additionally, teletherapy often allows for more part-time or contract-based opportunities, giving SLPs the ability to tailor their workload to their individual needs and preferences.
2. Increased Job Opportunities
   Virtual therapy removes geographic barriers, enabling SLPs to serve clients from multiple locations rather than being limited to a specific region. This expanded reach is particularly valuable for SLPs who live in areas with limited job opportunities or those looking to work with niche populations. However, licensure considerations still apply, meaning SLPs must ensure they are properly credentialed in any state they provide services. Despite this, telepractice opens up career opportunities that may not be available in traditional settings, including positions with nationwide teletherapy providers, remote school contracts, and private telepractice businesses.
3. Cost Savings
   Teletherapy can significantly reduce costs for both SLPs and clients. For therapists, working from home eliminates commuting expenses, professional wardrobe costs, and other in-office expenditures. Those operating a private practice benefit from lower overhead costs since they do not need to rent office space or purchase materials for an in-person setting. From the client’s perspective, telepractice may reduce transportation expenses and time constraints, making therapy more accessible and convenient.
4. Technology-Driven Engagement
   Many teletherapy platforms integrate interactive tools, digital games, screen sharing, and virtual whiteboards, which can enhance engagement for certain clients. These features allow SLPs to create customized, interactive experiences that may not always be possible in traditional settings. Additionally, the use of recorded sessions and data tracking can help both therapists and clients monitor progress over time. For school-aged children and tech-savvy clients, the novelty and interactivity of teletherapy can be a motivating factor, keeping them engaged in the learning process.

Cons of Virtual Speech Therapy

1. Client Engagement Challenges
   While technology can enhance engagement, it can also present challenges—especially for younger children or clients with attention difficulties. Keeping a child engaged through a screen requires different strategies compared to in-person sessions, where an SLP can use physical prompts, movement-based activities, and hands-on materials. For children with sensory processing difficulties or those who struggle with sustained attention, virtual therapy may not be as effective as traditional face-to-face interaction. Therapists must be creative in their approach, utilizing digital tools, parent involvement, and structured breaks to maintain focus.
2. Technology Barriers
   Reliable internet access, high-quality video and audio, and familiarity with teletherapy platforms are crucial for successful virtual sessions. However, not all clients—or even all therapists—have access to the necessary technology. Internet disruptions, lagging video, or poor sound quality can interfere with communication and affect the effectiveness of therapy. Additionally, ensuring compliance with HIPAA and other privacy regulations requires secure platforms, which may involve additional costs and training for SLPs who are new to telepractice.
3. Limited Hands-On Interaction
   One of the biggest drawbacks of virtual speech therapy is the inability to provide hands-on support. Many therapy techniques, such as PROMPT (which relies on physical touch for articulation training) or oral-motor exercises, are difficult or impossible to implement in a virtual setting. While some therapists involve parents or caregivers in sessions to help with physical cueing, this may not always be a viable option. Clients who require tactile feedback, modeling, or in-person reinforcement may not experience the same level of progress in a virtual format.
4. Licensing & Reimbursement Issues
   Although telepractice expands job opportunities, it also comes with licensing and reimbursement challenges. SLPs must be licensed in any state where they provide services, which can involve additional fees and administrative work. Regulations surrounding telehealth vary by state, and navigating these requirements can be complex. Additionally, insurance reimbursement for teletherapy services is not always consistent, with some providers or state Medicaid programs having restrictions on what is covered. This can impact the financial stability of SLPs who rely on insurance-based payments for their practice.

Overall, virtual speech therapy provides increased flexibility, cost savings, and expanded career opportunities, making it an appealing option for many SLPs. However, it also presents challenges related to client engagement, technology, hands-on interaction, and licensing regulations. SLPs considering telepractice should weigh these factors carefully, ensuring that their skills, professional goals, and client needs align with the benefits and limitations of virtual therapy.

Key Career Considerations for SLPs

Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) have a range of career options, with both virtual (telepractice) and in-person settings offering unique advantages and challenges. When deciding which path to pursue, SLPs must consider several key factors, including salary differences, job satisfaction, burnout risk, and the best settings for career growth. Each of these elements plays a crucial role in shaping long-term career fulfillment and financial stability.

Salary Differences: Telepractice vs. Traditional Therapy

One of the biggest considerations for SLPs choosing between virtual and in-person therapy is salary and overall financial benefits. Earnings can vary significantly depending on the setting, employer, and geographic location. Another important factor to consider is the difference between 1099 contract work and W-2 employment opportunities, both of which are available in telepractice and traditional in-person settings.

While contract positions often offer higher hourly rates, they may not cover all indirect time, such as documentation, meeting attendance, or consultation hours. In some cases, contractors may not be compensated for any indirect work at all, which can impact actual earnings. It is important to research companies to see if they pay for indirect time, as this can significantly affect overall compensation. Additionally, access to a full battery of assessment tools and materials may be more limited in contract positions, requiring SLPs to invest in their own resources. W-2 employment, on the other hand, typically includes benefits such as health insurance, retirement contributions, and access to employer-provided assessment materials and professional development.

When comparing rates and wages, SLPs must evaluate not only the hourly pay but also the additional expenses and potential gaps in compensation for indirect time. Understanding these differences can help professionals make informed decisions about which employment model aligns best with their financial goals and work preferences.

Telepractice Salaries

SLPs working in telepractice typically earn competitive salaries, but their income can fluctuate based on employment structure. Many virtual SLPs work as independent contractors rather than salaried employees, meaning their earnings depend on session volume, reimbursement rates, and client demand. Contract-based positions often provide higher hourly rates but may lack benefits like health insurance, retirement contributions, or paid time off.

Telepractice also allows SLPs to serve multiple states (with proper licensure), expand their client base, and potentially increase earnings compared to being restricted to a single geographic area. However, reimbursement for teletherapy services can be inconsistent across insurance providers and Medicaid programs, which may impact financial stability.

In-Person Therapy Salaries

SLPs in traditional settings, such as schools, hospitals, and private clinics, often receive stable salaries with benefits. Those employed by school districts typically receive a fixed annual salary, health benefits, retirement contributions, and paid time off. Salaries for in-person roles can vary based on location, with urban areas and medical settings generally offering higher pay compared to rural school-based positions.

Private practice owners can potentially earn more than salaried employees, but they also take on overhead costs such as office space rental, administrative expenses, and insurance billing fees. The financial security of in-person roles largely depends on the setting and whether the SLP is an employee or self-employed.

Which Pays More?

On average, telepractice and in-person therapy offer comparable earnings, but financial stability differs depending on the employment structure. SLPs seeking a consistent salary and benefits package, including health insurance and retirement contributions, may prefer traditional roles in schools, hospitals, or clinics. These positions provide a steady income and job security, which can be appealing for those who prioritize financial stability.

On the other hand, telepractice often provides higher hourly rates and greater flexibility, particularly for SLPs working as independent contractors under a 1099 tax status. Unlike traditional W-2 employment, 1099 contractors can deduct business-related expenses such as home office costs, internet services, professional development, and teletherapy software subscriptions, potentially reducing their taxable income. While independent contractors are responsible for handling their own taxes and securing private benefits, the ability to write off work-related expenses can provide a financial advantage that salaried employees do not receive.

For SLPs who value flexibility, autonomy, and the potential for increased earnings, teletherapy as an independent contractor may be an appealing choice. However, it is important to factor in the need for self-employment tax planning, healthcare costs, and retirement savings when comparing the financial benefits of telepractice versus traditional employment.

Job Satisfaction & Burnout: Workload, Flexibility, and Stress Levels

Job satisfaction is a major factor in long-term career sustainability, and burnout is a common challenge among SLPs. Workload, flexibility, and daily stress levels can vary greatly between telepractice and in-person roles.

Telepractice: Increased Flexibility, But Potential Isolation

Many SLPs appreciate telepractice for its greater work-life balance and autonomy. The ability to work from home eliminates commuting stress and provides more control over scheduling. This can lead to reduced burnout for those who struggle with long workdays and high caseload numbers  in clinical or school settings.

However, teletherapy also comes with challenges. Isolation can be a concern, as virtual SLPs miss out on the social aspects of working in a collaborative, in-person environment. Additionally, screen fatigue and engagement difficulties can contribute to stress, particularly when working with younger clients who struggle to focus in virtual sessions.

Some teletherapy companies recognize these challenges and offer support systems to help their therapists feel more connected and supported. At Lighthouse Therapy, every therapist receives a mentor in their discipline, providing guidance and professional development opportunities. Additionally, Clinical Coordinators and Clinical Directors are available to assist with case management and clinical questions. Lighthouse Therapy also provides multiple chat forums where therapists can find answers to questions, share experiences, and engage with colleagues. These types of support structures help reduce the sense of isolation that can come with telepractice and foster a sense of community among virtual therapists.

In-Person Therapy: More Client Interaction, But Higher Workload

SLPs in traditional roles often report higher job satisfaction due to face-to-face client interaction and stronger professional relationships. Many therapists find hands-on therapy more rewarding, particularly when working with populations that benefit from direct engagement. Team collaboration in schools, hospitals, and clinics also allows for better peer support and shared workload management.

However, burnout can be higher in in-person roles, especially in schools and healthcare settings where caseloads are often large. Furthermore, many states have no “cap” on caseload maximums. School-based SLPs may juggle high student-to-therapist ratios, heavy documentation demands, and limited session time per student, while hospital-based SLPs often face demanding schedules and medically complex cases. The physical demands of in-person therapy, such as traveling between sites or working long hours, can also contribute to fatigue.

Which is Better for Avoiding Burnout?

• Telepractice offers more flexibility but may lead to isolation and screen fatigue. Therapists also have more say in caseload numbers and types of cases. 
• In-person therapy allows for better client engagement and team support but can come with higher caseloads and physical stress. Additionally, many therapists usually have no say in caseload numbers, assignments, or types of cases. 
• Hybrid models (a mix of telepractice and in-person therapy) may provide the best balance for newer SLPs.

Best Settings for New SLPs

For new graduates or early-career SLPs, choosing the right work setting is crucial for gaining experience and career growth.

Schools

• Pros: Stable salary, summers off, strong team collaboration, predictable schedule.
• Cons: High caseloads, limited session time per student, administrative workload.
• Best for: SLPs who enjoy working with children, prefer structured schedules, and value job security with predictable pay structure. 

Hospitals & Medical Facilities

• Pros: Opportunities to work with diverse populations (stroke patients, traumatic brain injuries, swallowing disorders), higher salaries than schools.
• Cons: Intensive workload, physically demanding, requires additional medical training.
• Best for: SLPs interested in medical speech-language pathology and complex cases.

Private Practice (In-Person or Telepractice)

• Pros: Potential for higher earnings, control over caseload, flexible scheduling.
• Cons: Requires business skills, marketing, and handling insurance reimbursement.
• Best for: SLPs who want autonomy, entrepreneurship, or specialization.

Telepractice (Full-Time or Hybrid)

• Pros: Flexible hours, ability to work from home, lower stress from commutes.
• Cons: Technology barriers, engagement challenges, potential for isolation.
• Best for: SLPs who value remote work, tech-driven therapy, flexible schedules, and want to achieve a better work/life balance. 

Final Thoughts

When choosing between virtual and in-person speech therapy, SLPs should consider their career goals, salary expectations, work-life balance needs, and preferred client interaction style.

• Those prioritizing flexibility and autonomy may thrive in telepractice.
• Those who enjoy hands-on therapy and team collaboration may prefer in-person settings.

Ultimately, the best path is the one that aligns with an SLP’s personal strengths, professional aspirations, stage of their career, and lifestyle needs.

How to Decide: Virtual vs. In-Person Therapy as an SLP

Choosing between virtual and in-person speech therapy is a significant decision for speech-language pathologists (SLPs), especially for those early in their careers or considering a transition. Both settings offer unique advantages and challenges, so it is important to assess which aligns best with your professional goals, lifestyle preferences, and the needs of the clients you wish to serve.

The following key factors can help guide your decision-making process.

Factors to Consider

1. Your Preferred Work Environment
   One of the first questions to ask yourself is where you feel most comfortable working and where you will receive the most support. Some SLPs thrive in structured, face-to-face settings like schools, hospitals, or clinics, where they can collaborate directly with clients and colleagues. These environments provide opportunities for hands-on therapy, immediate feedback, and a sense of community with other professionals.

On the other hand, telepractice allows SLPs to work from home, eliminating commuting time and offering more flexibility in setting their own schedules. This can be a great option for those who value autonomy and work-life balance. However, working remotely requires discipline, organization, and the ability to manage sessions independently without the daily in-person support of a team.

2. Your Comfort with Technology and the Importance of Organization 

Successful teletherapy goes beyond just having a strong grasp of technology—it requires a high level of organization to ensure smooth and effective sessions. Telepractice relies on video conferencing platforms, digital therapy tools, and interactive software, making it essential for SLPs to stay organized with lesson planning, material preparation, and technical troubleshooting. Those who enjoy structuring their sessions in advance and maintaining digital resources will likely find teletherapy to be a good fit. Many platforms offer features such as digital worksheets, interactive games, and data-tracking tools that, when used efficiently, can enhance engagement and streamline progress monitoring.

However, if managing multiple virtual tools feels overwhelming or if you prefer the flexibility of hands-on, in-person activities, a traditional setting may be more suitable. Additionally, some clients—particularly young children or individuals with severe speech and language disorders—may struggle with virtual platforms, requiring therapists to have a well-organized plan for adapting sessions to maintain engagement. Success in teletherapy is not just about comfort with technology but also about having structured systems in place to manage digital resources, session flow, and client communication effectively.

3. The Types of Clients You Want to Serve
   Certain client populations may be better suited for one format over the other. Telepractice is often effective for school-aged children, older students, and adults who can stay engaged with virtual activities. It is also an excellent option for individuals in remote or underserved areas who may not have access to in-person services.

However, some clients benefit more from face-to-face therapy. Young children, especially toddlers, often require hands-on, play-based therapy that can be challenging to replicate through a screen. Clients who need physical cues, tactile feedback, or oral-motor therapy may also respond better to in-person sessions. Additionally, individuals with severe cognitive or developmental disabilities may require more direct interaction than telepractice allows.

These challenges can often be addressed through a consultative model, where the SLP collaborates closely with teachers, caregivers, or other professionals to implement therapy strategies in the child’s daily environment. With the right guidance and structured support, many skills can still be developed effectively in a virtual setting. Having a well-trained paraprofessional or aide present during teletherapy sessions can also make a significant difference, ensuring that the client receives necessary hands-on support while the SLP provides instruction and feedback remotely. This team-based approach allows for more effective intervention while maintaining the flexibility and accessibility of telepractice.

4. Your Career Goals and Long-Term Opportunities
   SLPs should consider their long-term professional aspirations when deciding between virtual and in-person therapy.

• If you are looking for stable, salaried positions with benefits, in-person settings like schools, hospitals, and rehabilitation centers typically provide more predictable employment structures.
• If you value flexibility and autonomy, telepractice may be a better fit, as it allows for part-time, contract, or even private practice opportunities.
• If you plan to specialize in medical speech-language pathology, in-person experience is essential for working with patients recovering from strokes, traumatic brain injuries, or swallowing disorders.
• If you want to expand your reach and work across multiple states, telepractice offers a broader client base, though it requires additional licensure considerations.

Some SLPs find that a hybrid model—a mix of in-person and telepractice work—provides a  balance of flexibility and professional fulfillment.

Questions to Ask Yourself Before Making a Decision

To further clarify which path aligns with your skills and preferences, consider the following questions:

• Do I enjoy hands-on therapy, or do I prefer using digital tools and interactive virtual platforms?
• Am I comfortable troubleshooting technology issues and ensuring a smooth teletherapy experience?
• Do I need a consistent salary and benefits, or do I prefer the flexibility of contract work?
• What types of clients do I want to work with, and which therapy format will best serve their needs?
• Am I comfortable working independently, or do I thrive in a team-based, collaborative environment?
• How important is work-life balance to me, and does telepractice or in-person therapy better support my lifestyle?
• Am I willing to obtain multiple state licenses if I choose telepractice?

Final Thoughts & Next Steps

Deciding between virtual and in-person speech therapy is an important step in shaping a fulfilling and sustainable career as a speech-language pathologist. Both approaches offer unique benefits and challenges, and the best choice will depend on individual preferences, career goals, and the populations an SLP wishes to serve.

Throughout this discussion, we have explored the key differences between telepractice and traditional in-person therapy. Virtual therapy provides flexibility, expanded job opportunities, and reduced overhead costs, making it an appealing choice for many SLPs. However, it also presents technology barriers, engagement challenges, and limitations in hands-on therapy. In contrast, in-person therapy offers stronger client interaction, more effective treatment for certain populations, and greater collaboration with multidisciplinary teams, but it comes with higher costs, commuting requirements, and potential burnout from heavy caseloads.

For SLPs still weighing their options, shadowing both teletherapy and in-person therapy sessions can be a valuable way to gain firsthand experience. Observing sessions in different settings can help clarify which approach aligns best with personal strengths and professional aspirations. Many schools, clinics, and teletherapy providers allow prospective SLPs to observe experienced clinicians, providing insight into session dynamics, client engagement, and workflow differences.

Resources for SLPs Exploring Telepractice

For those interested in pursuing telepractice, understanding training, licensing, and job opportunities is essential. Below are some key resources:

• Telepractice Training and Certifications: Organizations like the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) and online continuing education platforms offer telepractice-specific training, covering topics such as technology use, client engagement strategies, and ethical considerations.
• Licensing Requirements: Teletherapy requires SLPs to be licensed in each state where they provide services. Checking state-specific regulations through ASHA’s State-by-State Licensure Guide or individual state licensing boards is a crucial step.
• Job Opportunities: Many teletherapy providers, school districts, and healthcare organizations offer remote positions. Job boards such as ASHA’s Career Portal, Indeed, and LinkedIn regularly post openings for telepractice SLPs.

Explore Teletherapy Career Opportunities

For SLPs interested in flexible, rewarding teletherapy careers, Lighthouse Therapy offers exciting opportunities to work with diverse client populations in a remote setting. Each therapist is given a mentor and provided with ongoing support, no matter the challenges they face. We encourage therapists to ask questions and seek guidance so they can find solutions to engagement challenges, limitations in hands-on therapy, and other obstacles that may arise in telepractice.

At Lighthouse Therapy, we understand that teletherapy requires innovative strategies to maintain high-quality intervention. That’s why we offer live chat and interactive tech support from 8 AM to 8 PM EST, ensuring that therapists always have access to immediate assistance when they need it. Additionally, we provide training on how to effectively implement more hands-on therapy in a virtual setting. Through structured support and the use of aides or paraprofessionals, SLPs can successfully facilitate hands-on learning even from a distance. We also offer interactive training in augmentative and alternative communication and assistive technology services, empowering therapists to enhance their sessions with cutting-edge tools.

If you are ready to explore a career in telepractice, visit Lighthouse Therapy’s career page to learn more about available positions, licensing support, and training resources. Our team is here to help you build a successful, rewarding career in teletherapy while ensuring that you never feel isolated or unsupported.